Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Respiratory Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study

Francesco Blasi1*, Helmut Ostermann2, Jill Racketa3, Jesús Medina4, Kyle McBride5, Javier Garau6 and on behalf of the REACH study group

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, IRCCS Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore, Policlinico Cà Granda Milano, Italy

2 Department of Internal Medicine III, Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany

3 Health Economics and Outcomes Research, AstraZeneca, 1800 Concord Pike, 19850 Wilmington, DE, USA

4 Medical Evidence Centre (Global Medical Affairs), AstraZeneca, Parque Norte, Edificio Roble, Serrano Galvache 56, 28033 Madrid, Spain

5 Instat Services, Inc., 1 Wilson Street, Chatham, NJ 07928 USA

6 Department of Medicine, Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Plaza Doctor Robert 5, 08221 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

For all author emails, please log on.

Respiratory Research 2014, 15:6  doi:10.1186/1465-9921-15-6

Published: 22 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Key goals in the treatment of CAP include early response to treatment and achievement of clinical stability. The US FDA recommends early response endpoints (72 hours after initiation of treatment) in clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. REACH (REtrospective Study to Assess the Clinical Management of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections [cSSTI] or CAP in the Hospital Setting) was a retrospective observational study, providing current data on the clinical management and resource burden of CAP in real-life settings in European hospitals. This analysis reviews the characteristics and outcomes of patients showing early positive response to treatment (time to clinical stability [TCS] ≤4 days, as assessed by Halm’s criteria) compared with patients with later positive response (TCS >4 days).

Methods

Patients were adults, hospitalized with CAP (2010–2011) and requiring in-hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics.

Results

Of the 2039 patients included in REACH, 585 (28.7%) had TCS assessed by Halm’s criteria: 332 (56.8%) showed early response (median 3.0 days), and 253 (43.2%) showed later response to treatment (median 7.0 days). Use of Halm’s criteria varied across participating countries, ranging from 0% (Belgium) to 49.1% (UK). Patient characteristics and relevant medical history were similar between the two groups. There were no notable differences in initial antibiotic therapy between groups, except that more early responders had been treated with amoxicillin–clavulanate and amoxicillin monotherapy (22.6%; 7.5%, respectively) than later responders (5.9%; 1.2%, respectively). Initial treatment modification and re-infection or recurrences were less frequent in early responders compared with later responders (14.2% and 3.3% vs. 34.8% and 5.9%, respectively). Early responders had a shorter duration of hospitalization (mean 9.4 ± SD 7.0; median 8.0 days vs. mean 15.6 ± SD 10.5; median 12.0 days, respectively), lower rate of ICU admission (3.3% vs. 21.3%) and shorter duration of ICU stay (mean 6.2 ± SD 5.7; median 4.0 days vs. mean 10.4 ± SD 10.1; median 8.0 days, respectively) compared with later responders. Mortality was low in both groups.

Conclusions

Achieving early clinical stabilization in CAP (≤4 days) is associated with improved outcomes, lower requirement for initial treatment modification or readmission and lower resource use, compared with a later response.

Trial registration

NCT01293435

Keywords:
Clinical stability; Community-acquired pneumonia; Early response; Resource use